We argue that in-person attendance limits for houses of worship single out religious expression and unfairly discriminate against people of all faiths.
We served as co-counsel with the Becket Fund in suing Andrew Cuomo and the New York state government on behalf of the Lebovits family and Bais Yaakov, a Jewish school in New York City.
In this case, we defend the free exercise right of a Jewish girl school against the unlawful discrimination by New York’s governor.
In this case we argue that the ministerial exception protects not only established majority religious traditions, but minority ones as well.
A former employee of a parish in the Archdiocese of Chicago is suing for alleged discrimination following his firing.
In this case, Georgia Gwinnett College discriminated against a Christian student by suppressing his right to share his faith publicly.
In this brief we argue that the First Amendment protects the rights of religious business owners against compelled speech that violates their conscience.
In this brief we defend the church autonomy doctrine, arguing that the secular government should not be interfering in internal ecclesiastical matters pertaining to religious institutions.
We argue that a church is entitled to a property tax exemption without needing a certificate of occupancy.
We argue that the ministerial exception should be understood broadly in order to cover religious leaders of all types including those who do not look like traditional Christian religious functionaries.
In this case concerning whether religious groups on campus can legally require their leaders to share their faith, we argue that such religious solidarity is particularly important for Jewish groups.
We explain the importance of courts deferring to religious employers’ understanding of their faith in determining whether an employee engages in religious activity for the purposes of the ministerial exception.
We argue that the desire of religious adoption agencies to place children with members of their own faith is an entirely understandable act of religious solidarity that is especially important to religious minorities.
We argue that the ministerial exception should be understood broadly in order to cover religious leaders of all types including those who do not look like traditional Christian religious functionaries.
We highlight the importance of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act to religious Jews.
We write in favor of interpreting the Lanham Act so as to protect the names of religious institutions.
We argue that discriminatory zoning land use ordinances against religious groups violates RLUIPA and should be abandoned.
We argue that medical professionals should not be forced to provide certain services, like abortion and sterilization, that would violate their sincere religious beliefs.
We argue that religious solidarity is particularly important for Jewish groups, and that religious groups on college campuses have the right to require their leaders to share their faith commitments.
In this case concerning the meaning of the Free Exercise Clause, we highlight the ways in which the unduly restrictive interpretation of that clause found in Employment Division v. Smith harms Jews and other religious minorities.
This case helped spur the formation of the Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty. JCRL filed an amicus brief in support of a group of Catholic nuns who simply wished to continue to care for poor retirees without violating their religion.
This case helped spur the formation of the Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty. JCRL filed an amicus brief in support of a group of Catholic nuns who simply wished to continue to care for poor retirees without violating their religion.
The Ministerial Exception is once again challenged in the courts. In this case we argue that a Catholic school has the right to hire or fire employees in accordance with its religious tradition.
We argue that the Blaine Amendment, which enshrines religious discrimination into law, is a violation of the First Amendment and is fundamentally harmful to religious minorities.
In this case, we argue that a catholic adoption agency in Philadelphia should be free to operate in accordance with its faith without fear of government reprisals.
In this case, the petitioners argue that sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) should be interpreted as being part of the Civil Rights Title VII non- discrimination statute. We argue that such a radical change will threaten the religious liberties of all Americans of all faiths for generations to come.
The free exercise of religion is a sacred right. In this brief, we argue that Arlene’s Flowers has the right to freely exercise that right in public, as well as in private, and cannot be forced to participate in religious ceremonies that violate its conscience.
In this amicus brief, we argue that a private Catholic hospital in California has the right to make conscience based decisions regarding its sincerely held religious beliefs.
In this case, Georgia Gwinnett College discriminated against a Christian student by suppressing his right to share his faith publicly.
The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty is proud to announce that it has entered an amicus brief in the case Business Leaders in Christ v. the University of Iowa.
In this case, the owners of an art studio were forced to consider the following dilemma: custom-design wedding art for a ceremony they could not religiously condone – or go to jail.
The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty is proud to announce a Supreme Court amicus brief arguing that merely being offended by a religious display is insufficient cause to create standing to bring an Establishment Clause lawsuit.
The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty joined an amicus brief in a case involving California’s attempt to coerce churches into offering elective abortion coverage in their health insurance plans.
The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty filed an amicus brief in
support of Catholic Social Services of Philadelphia, arguing that they
must not be shut down simply because they wish to facilitate adoptions
in accordance with its faith.
JCRL submitted an amicus brief urging the US Supreme Court to hear the case Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC.
The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty is proud to announce its
filing of a brief in support of cert in the Bladensburg cross case.
The head of the organization “Freedom From Religion” claimed that it
was unconstitutional for Congress to open the day with a prayer and not
to allow secular invocations as well.
The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty filed an amicus brief in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, defending the Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops’ right to keep its internal religious deliberations from being shared with abortion providers.
In this case, a group of atheists challenged the seal and flag of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania. The plaintiffs argue that the Latin cross which is present on both symbols is meant to represent and therefore endorses Christianity in violation of the Establishment Clause.
Brush & Nib is a calligraphy company that creates customized art. Its owners are Christians who operate their business in keeping with their faith.
JCRL’s predecessor, Jews for Religious Liberty, served as co-counsel with Becket in suing the Federal Emergency Management Agency on behalf of Chabad of Key West.
The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty joined the Religious Liberty Commission and the Kentucky Baptist convention in support of affirming those decisions. Amici demonstrated that an adherent’s faith impacts every aspect of his life and makes demands on his conscience at work as much at church.
JCRL was proud to support the First Amendment right to free speech when it submitted this brief in support of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates.
The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty, together with several other Jewish organizations filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in support of the City and urging reversal on the grounds that merely being “offended” is insufficient to confer standing on the plaintiffs.
The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty argued that the 9th Circuit should reverse the panels decision and protect the rights of all religious people—especially those who belong to minority faiths.
Jews For Religious Liberty submitted an amicus brief in the case, showing that FEMA’s policy of denying hurricane relief to religious organizations because of their religious affiliation or practice is unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
In this case, a religious Christian cake artist was sued for declining to custom-design a cake celebrating a same-sex marriage ceremony. JCRL joined and contributed to an amicus brief filed by the Whitehead Law Firm of Kansas City, MO on behalf of a number of religious groups.
The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty joined an amicus brief in support of Arlene’s case, along the Washington State Catholic Conference, Imam Shahin, and the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission.
In August 2017, the Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty filed an in support of Bloomfield’s appeal. We explained that the court’s decision stigmatized the Ten Commandments, and erased a Jewish contribution to the United States. Further, the court’s analysis harms religious minorities.
Partnering with the Becket Fund, the Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty filed an amicus brief in support of Susan’s case, petitioning to overturn the ruling of the Fourth Circuit on two grounds.
The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty submitted an in support of Chabad’s appeal. We explained that the City’s zoning decision does not violate the Establishment Clause. Rather, the approval to build the permit was the outcome of the regular political process.
The letter requested that the Department of Health and Human Services make a sincere attempt at accommodating organizations that objected to its abortifacient mandate on religious grounds.
This case helped spur the formation of the Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty. Rabbi Mitchell Rocklin led a group of Jewish rabbis, represented by Howard Slugh, in filing an amicus brief in support of a group of Catholic nuns who simply wished to continue to care for poor retirees without violating their religion.